Categories
Uncategorized

Call to Action: Centering First-Year Writers

Call to Action: Centering First-Year Writers

written by Theo Grayer, Joseph Petchauer, Jake Rothman, Gian Zaninelli

A specter is haunting the writing center: the specter of first-year students. Indispensable to the goals and maintenance of the program itself, first-year students are an essential aspect of any well-formed writing program outreach strategy. However, to effectively reach these students, their motivations and needs must be well understood. But first, why are they so crucial? Aren’t first-year students like any others? No! First year students face the unique challenges of transitioning to college along with the difficulties of continuing to grow. They are also the future of the writing program. The students whom WAs can make a good impression on are more likely to return to the program in the future and speak well of the program to others. More importantly, students will have the potential to benefit over a longer time span, making it easier for the WA program to effect change on their writing abilities.

We would be remiss to ignore an equally important aspect of first-year writers: their mentality and interests. As Crystal Tsang explains in her inquiry project, first-year students primarily view the writing center as a vehicle for achieving good grades. One student notes that students “mentioned that they would come [to the center] if it would guarantee them an A.” Rather than immediately dismiss this claim as “selfish,” or “grade-grubby,” we ought to take this interest seriously. First-year students are entering college from high school environments that prioritize grades above anything else. Many members of this group remember staying up all night to get an A on an assignment. Moreover, it was these very instincts, this grade-centered attitude, that helped us get into an institution with an acceptance rate as low as Swarthmore. 

While it is up to the larger Swarthmore community to correct for this as first-years enter the college, at the writing center we, too, have a responsibility. During our first WA conferences with first-years, it’s up to us to initiate a paradigm shift from external to internal motivation, from writing as a means of achieving good grades to writing as inherently valuable within the learning process Swarthmore and the writing center seek to cultivate. By focusing on the writing process and strategy rather than simple corrections and other “grade-focused” issues for an individual paper, our goal is to instill a love of writing in first-years that shows them what they are capable of even early on in their college career. As Aly Ye explains in her inquiry project, students want to focus on big-picture items like content, argument, and structure in their conferences, so it seems clear that below the grade-centric orientation of most first-years, there is also a latent desire to become better writers and students as a whole that we as WAs can help realize.

Here is where our call-to-action comes into play. We think that to effectively assist first-years in their writing processes, and discover themselves as writers, a two-fold plan is necessary: first, we need to bring first-years into the writing center. Having more professors require their first-year students to attend the writing center would expose them to more intimate and peer-led discussions about writing. And second, as WAs, we can focus these meetings less on helping students with their papers, but rather assisting them through the relaying of helpful writing practices, and suggestions that they can use during their next few years of college. We’d essentially be tailoring these sessions more to the writer than the paper (which is already a concept that we WAs are familiar with, but we can lean more heavily into it when dealing with first-year students).

First-year students are new to the college experience; some guidance can go a long way. We can be the people to provide that guidance.

Categories
Uncategorized

Dear Future Writing Associates,

Dear Future Writing Associates,

We’ve been WA-iting for you! It’s Annabel and Kyra coming at you from Hobbs on October 25, 2021. The warm bagels are definitely waking us up on this chilly morning. Now that we have a handful of WA conferences under our belt, we thought we’d share some of our reflections and advice with you!

First off, congratulations on being a WA! This is a great accomplishment, and take some time to celebrate that. Being a WA is an important responsibility on campus, and you’re serving as a role model for students in not just writing but also work ethic, time management, and critical thinking, but remember that being a WA is supposed to be fun. Take advantage of the fact that you’re now surrounded by fellow WAs who will be helping you through the process and keeping you company in the Writing Center. Get to know the comfy couch-chairs in the ground floor of Trotter where you’ll be holding a lot of your meetings. (Revel in the fresh fruit in the fridge — you won’t get fruit that good anywhere else on campus!)

Even though you may be younger or less versed in a specific subject compared to your WA-ee, your feedback is still valuable! Oftentimes the circumstances of a process such as peer-editing and student-to-student feedback is conducted within the boundaries of a shared class, so it is understandable to worry that inexperience in a field will affect the helpfulness of your critiques. However! An outside perspective is always helpful to the writing process. In fact, having less knowledge of a topic can allow a WA to focus more so on clarity, structure, flow, and other elements that are critical to every piece of writing. A case can be argued that being more familiar with the requirements of academic writing within the confines of a particular field means that the WA is more able to focus on key topic-specific elements. As noted by one interviewed WA in the Inquiry Project, “Generalists vs Specialists” (Litton 2010), generalist WAs may be able to separate themselves from content points and more effectively give feedback to overall structure points; they are less distracted by content concerns. In the case for topics WAs feel especially uncomfortable WAing, providing a brief synopsis of key elements of successful writing in that field may help boost the WA’s confidence and thus reduce the impact that nerves could have on the feedback process (Havilund-Blunk et al. 2015).

My main takeaway in my first couple of conferences — and something that I wish I had thought about earlier — is that it’s ok to not know the answer to every question. Depending on the WA-ees’s previous experiences with the Writing Center or their overall expectations of the conference, the WA-ee might think that the conference will consist of you, the WA, telling them exactly how to change their paper and which words to delete in order to get an A. In fact, a previous Writing Center inquiry project showed that often first-time users of the Writing Center expect conferences to be primarily directive rather than collaborative, which may put you in a situation where a student asks you how to strengthen an argument and you don’t have a perfectly packaged, easy-to-implement-and-explain answer for them. This is fine! One of the best parts of WA conferences is that they’re conversations. If you share your perspective but you’re not sure if it’s the best option, you can say that to your WA-ee and then discuss possible alternatives to what you proposed. Ask questions of your WA-ee, get to know their thought process, and think about what you would do in their position. Remember that ultimately, you are qualified to be a WA, and not knowing the answer to a question doesn’t take away from that.

You got this! We know that you will do a great job and learn so much from these experiences regardless of your background in writing! (Saving the worst — best? — pun for last) You’re going to be WA-some!

Much love,

Kyra and Annabel

Categories
Uncategorized

Hello world!

Welcome to Fall 2021 Moodle Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!